


Worms Ultimate Mayhem vs Hogs of War

Higher community rating
Hogs of War
+9
rating points
More player ratings
Hogs of War
49 ratings

Quick Take
Shared Taste
Worms Ultimate Mayhem Stands Out
Hogs of War Stands Out
Higher Rated
Similarity Breakdown
Similar
Game Modes
Similar
Perspective
Similar
Genres
Similar
Themes
Different
Features
Shared
Game Modes
Perspective
Genres
Themes
Features
Key Differences
Game Modes
Worms Ultimate Mayhem
Hogs of War
-Perspective
Worms Ultimate Mayhem
Hogs of War
-Genres
Worms Ultimate Mayhem
-Hogs of War
Themes
Worms Ultimate Mayhem
-Hogs of War
Features
Worms Ultimate Mayhem
Hogs of War
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | Worms Ultimate Mayhem | Hogs of War |
|---|---|---|
| Release Date | Sep 28, 2011 | Sep 5, 2000 |
| Rating | 65/100 (44 ratings) | 74/100 (49 ratings) |
| Genres | StrategyTurn-based strategy (TBS) | StrategyTacticalTurn-based strategy (TBS) |
| Themes | ActionComedy | ActionComedyWarfare |
| Features | tactical turn-based combatturn-basedtime limitavatar awardsdeath matchteam deathmatchdestructible environmentfunny | tactical turn-based combatturn-basedtime limitracial stereotypesscatological humorpigworld war i - ww1modern militarymodern warfarewarcountdown timerdark humor |
| Game Modes | Co-operativeMultiplayerSingle player | MultiplayerSingle player |
| Player Perspective | Bird view / IsometricThird person | Third person |
| Platforms | PC (Microsoft Windows), PlayStation 3, Xbox 360 | PC (Microsoft Windows), PlayStation, PlayStation 3 |
Comparison Summary
Worms Ultimate Mayhem and Hogs of War have a 7/10 match score. Both games overlap around Multiplayer, Single player, Third person, Strategy, Turn-based strategy (TBS), Action.
Worms Ultimate Mayhem stands out for Co-operative, Bird view / Isometric, avatar awards, death match, while Hogs of War stands out for Tactical, Warfare, racial stereotypes, scatological humor.
Hogs of War has the higher community rating in the current dataset. Players who enjoy Multiplayer, Single player, Third person are the most likely to find value in both.
